Pr. Marco Feliciano

Marco Feliciano is a Brazilian evangelical pastor and politician who stands out for his work in the House of Representatives. He is the president of the Assembly of God Church and has a prominent profile as a defender of issues related to family, education, and the rights of the elderly. Below are some relevant points about his political career and positions:

1. Terms and votes: Feliciano is in his third term as a federal deputy and was elected for a fourth term starting in 2023, with an impressive 220,000 votes. His debut in the House of Representatives occurred in 2011, when he was the second most voted evangelical politician in Brazil and the 12th among the deputies elected by the state of São Paulo.

2. Presidency of the Human Rights and Minorities Commission (CDHM): In 2013, Marco Feliciano was elected president of the CDHM, a position that brought him national prominence and generated controversy. During his time on the commission, he was involved in heated debates, especially regarding LGBT+ issues and human rights.

3. Controversies: Feliciano has been at the center of several controversies, often related to his positions on LGBT+ causes. His attempt to pass a bill that would annul sections of a resolution by the Federal Council of Psychology, which deals with the treatment of homosexuality, generated intense debates and criticism. In addition, he faced criticism for a dental treatment that reportedly cost R$ 157,000 to public coffers.

4. Political stances: The congressman is known for his fervent defense of conservative and religious agendas, including the importance of family and opposition to changes in traditional standards. He also supports education with religious principles and defends the rights of the elderly.

5. Activities beyond politics: In addition to his political career, Marco Feliciano is also a writer and singer. His influence in the religious and cultural scene contributes to his visibility and reach.

It is worth highlighting that Marco Feliciano's actions and positions generate divergent opinions in Brazilian society, with him being supported by some voters who share his conservative views, as well as criticized by groups who consider his positions controversial or harmful to certain segments of the population.